in principle we need to know and explain the nature of music itself. the most familiar thingto begin to assume the music is the sound, which believes that there is more to do withhuman phenomenon called music. for this second opinion is necessary to our understandingof human phenomena such as what might be called music.
let us ask ourselves, is there any sense of where music is a human activity? logical answer"yes yes is", without any form of human activity, there can be no sound of a musical ormusical works are created. in short, what music it is basically a human activity. nah, if so,when we eat is the music, when we ride public transportation is the music, when we take abath is the music, really?
In the show case of my colleagues, product, or music that comes from the mind, what is offered is more than just a music product, or a composition per se, or merely an improvisation, or a mere show. But what is offered is the result of human activity that have a specific purpose. This means music that is not merely a bundle of products or objects, but in this case is more seen as a symbol, emblem, namely "to say something about something", so music dealing with the meaning and message to the sink. Meaning and message can be affected by the current context of human work, whether it is the goal, audience and so forth.
people named hyden do something that is creating concerto. what he did was to create something in the context of time, place and type of piece of music at that time. in the case of co-author of her performance, she did something. what he did was to create, compose, perform, improvise, and record something with the context of the time, place, and other types of musical works. so many kinds of kinds of musical situations in which the composers in the act of creating his work.
if music is basically a form of human activities that have a specific intention, at least in music includes three components, namely, the composer, musical products they produce, and the activities in which the composer makes musical product. but according to all three authors was incomplete, as well as "make sambel not use cayenne pepper." composer to make something (music), are in a specific context. means that when the composer out of ideas, will be influenced by the particular context, as mentioned above, can be seen from its purpose, audience, place or time.
Examples of cases, when a composer to create music from musical gong. To ring the gong, struck in accordance with certain norms, but the composer ring it in a way swiped and beaten with stones and even tanks rolled a tire that will be transported into the truck. Of course what the composer is not crazy? Of course not, if it is associated with a context that has been described previously. That means the composer has a purpose, find out who your audience or spectators, to know where the place and time.
of the explanation, the music eventually include four components:
2) the process of creating the work,
4) the context in which composers create something.
so, all four components of the approach above, co-author in creating the work:
1) the result of musical experiences in a systematic, meaning that the experience was influenced by the stage musical iwan musical stage, whether it is from learning, watching, listening, or advice, advice from mentors,
2) the activity of a motivated in making the work,
3) the activities that have a specific purpose,
4) activity is influenced by the context in which the iwan create works of music.
He was influenced by the context of why and how the listener / audience (including herself) to listen to what makes. Instead, the listener / audience is influenced by the why, what and how to do what composers have created. So my colleagues do not always make their works to dipergelarkan disebuah marriage or circumcision celebrations. Yeah, the context for understanding the work he has more than just music.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar